Investors Demand Hearing, Investigation and Reversal of Washington Mutual Seizure

Released on: October 27, 2008, 9:47 pm

Press Release Author: Michael Rozenfeld / wamurape.org

Industry: Financial

Press Release Summary: Washington Mutual Bank shareholders are uniting to challenge
the actions of the FDIC and JPM prior to the seizure of Washington Mutual bank.
Shareholders contend these actions were unjustified and ultimately unethical.
Indeed, shareholders insist that Washington Mutual Bank never did fail, and by most
accounts, had enough funds to cover the withdrawals by depositors. Reports now
surfacing indicate the liquidity of the bank was much better than the public was led
to believe. Washington Mutual executives knew that, and their claims that the bank
was in good health days before the seizure, were ignored. We contend the FDIC was
not right in doing so and have caused irreparable harm not only to the WAMU
stockholders, but to the markets in general, and the banking community. This is the
shot that has been heard around the world, and the world markets have reacted
adversely. Shareholders of thousands of companies throughout the world have lost
trillions of dollars since.


Press Release Body: Washington Mutual Bank shareholders are uniting to challenge the
actions of the FDIC and JPM prior to the seizure of Washington Mutual bank.
Shareholders contend these actions were unjustified and ultimately unethical.
Indeed, shareholders insist that Washington Mutual Bank never did fail, and by most
accounts, had enough funds to cover the withdrawals by depositors. Reports now
surfacing indicate the liquidity of the bank was much better than the public was led
to believe. Washington Mutual executives knew that, and their claims that the bank
was in good health days before the seizure, were ignored. We contend the FDIC was
not right in doing so and have caused irreparable harm not only to the WAMU
stockholders, but to the markets in general, and the banking community. This is the
shot that has been heard around the world, and the world markets have reacted
adversely. Shareholders of thousands of companies throughout the world have lost
trillions of dollars since.

The FDIC seized Washington Mutual Bank saying there had been a bank run amounting to
16.7 billion dollars in 10 days. The reason this money was withdrawn from the bank
is only guessed. The FDIC saw money moving out of larger accounts and assumed a run
was in progress.WAMU had worked out a solid business plan with the OTC just 2 weeks
before the FDIC seized the bank. WAMU had access to $50 billion in assets at the
time of seizure. They had sufficient liquidity to handle their obligations. After
not collecting insurance premiums from 1996-2006, and the failures in the previous
weeks, FDIC reserves were low. Appointed officials at the FDIC were concerned the
FDIC could not handle the failure of Washington Mutual if it was followed by other
bank failures as well. The FDIC had the ability to borrow $30 billion from the
Federal Reserve, but it did not. The move was about protecting the federal deposit
insurance company and not about protecting the insured with the confidence the FDIC
is supposed to show in a crisis.

The FDIC acted prematurely, anticipating failure, and behind closed doors. The
Washington Mutual Executives had no knowledge of the plan--the FDIC gave them no
prior indication. WAMU was in the midst of sale negotiations with several other
banks, and had been given no deadline to find a buyer by the FDIC. Banks who were
contemplating buying Washington Mutual had been notified by the FDIC that the FDIC
was to auction off the bank, unbeknownst to WAMU, who was involved in trying to sell
the bank. The FDIC action, behind WAMU's back, prevented a sale from being made.
Behind closed doors, the FDIC was offering them a much sweeter deal. The FDIC
arranged for JPMorgan to purchase the $300 billion dollar corporation for 1.9
billion dollars after notifying them privately, well in advance of the seizure.

The FDIC needs to be held accountable for its short sighted action which has caused
havoc throughout world markets. The FDIC had a lot of options if WAMU faltered --
seizing the bank and selling it overnight in a clandestine deal with JPMorgan, for a
miniscule fraction of its value, was the worst of any options they had. Did the FDIC
act appropriately? Most shareholders don't think so and they want the FDIC to answer
for that.

The result of their hasty and secretive action was that hundreds of billions of
dollars were lost by the shareholders of Washington Mutual Bank. Shareholder
portfolios were emptied overnight-- because of collusion between the FDIC and JPM in
weeks leading up to the seizure. Now, shareholders seek redress.

Never has the law been applied with such disregard for its intention. At the moment
the eyes of the country were on the markets, it was as if somebody climbed up to the
top of a building in New York City and screamed BANKFAILURE!! Government regulators
were the ones responsible for protecting us. But they circulated insider information
about the bank to its competitors and put the blood in the water amongst the sharks.

Coincidentally, JPMorgan has been the institution who has profited handsomely from
these failures. Coincidentally, the former head of the SEC works at JPMorgan, and
this week was accused of private conversation causing difficulties that may have
resulted in the first bank failure, Bear Stearns. JPMorgan has also been accused of
interfering in Lehman Brothers access to $5 billion dollars which helped catapult
their demise. They have been accused of denying WAMU access to $5 billion dollars
they had on deposit with JPMorgan.

Is this coincidence? We think not. We demand the FBI and the legislature thoroughly
investigate the relationships and actions of the OTS, the FDIC, the SEC and JPMorgan
management. We do understand the government is currently investigating Washington
Mutual, but we contend these other institutions need to be investigated.

One of our goals is that the assets or at least the asset value of Washington Mutual
be returned to them just as they were in the lawsuit filed by First City
Bancorporation in 1992. The FDIC was forced by the courts (1993) to return 145
million dollars to creditors and depositors, after they hastily seized that bank and
its assets. The same situation happened here. WAMURAPE.ORG members feel the FDIC can
be held accountable for their actions and there seems to be legal precedent for
that. Holding the FDIC accountable is exactly what the members of WAMURAPE.ORG
intend to do.

For further information about events surrounding the seizure or to join the effort
for justice, Click on the link www.wamurape.org .

Members of the group are currently seeking exceptional legal representation--the
members of congress themselves! We ask for special legislation. We ask for special
dispensation. We ask for congressional support. We want our bank back-the FDIC
should not have given it away to start with. We beseech our government to right this
wrong.



Web Site: http://www.wamurape.org/

Contact Details: Info@wamurape.org

  • Printer Friendly Format
  • Back to previous page...
  • Back to home page...
  • Submit your press releases...
  •